FAQ

Register       Login

Your Help Needed: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].

 

 

Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

Proposed Local Rules

                

 

Welcome!

 

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website. To post a petition or comment, however, you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

BEFORE POSTING, PLEASE READ: 

Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment.  Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 21 May 2026 12:27 PM by  Kevin Heade
R-26-0007 Petition to Amend Ariz. R. Crim. P. 6.3 to Protect a Defendant’s Post- Conviction Rights and Comply with Garza v. Idaho, 586 U.S. 232 (2019)
 5 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
Kevin Heade
New Member
Posts:19 New Member

--
08 Jan 2026 07:35 PM
    Kevin D. Heade
    AZ State Bar # 029909
    Training Director
    Pinal County Public Defender
    P.O. Box 2457
    Florence, AZ 85132
    (520) 866-7199
    [email protected]

    Pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the Arizona Supreme Court Rules, the Pinal County Public Defender and Pinal County Office of Public Defense Services jointly petition this Court to amend Ariz. R. Crim. P. 6.3. This petition seeks to amend Rule 6.3(b)&(c) of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure to require that trial or plea counsel, before being permitted to withdraw, must take necessary ministerial steps to preserve the defendant’s right to appellate or post-conviction review. Specifically, the proposal extends the continuing duty of representation under Ariz. R. Crim. P. 6.3(b) to include the filing of a notice of post-conviction relief. Additionally, the proposal amends Ariz. R. Crim. P. 6.3(c) to require that, before a court grants a motion to withdraw after a judgment, the motion to withdraw must reflect that (1) counsel has advised the defendant of their rights and the defendant has not directed counsel to file a notice of appeal, or if applicable, a notice of post-conviction relief, or that (2) such a notice has already been filed.

    This amendment ensures that withdrawal cannot operate as a procedural forfeiture of the defendant’s constitutional right to review. It also harmonizes Arizona’s procedural framework with Garza v. Idaho, 586 U.S. 232 (2019), Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 (2000), and McCoy v. Louisiana, 584 U.S. 414 (2018), while resolving the ambiguity exposed by State v. Ainsworth, 250 Ariz. 457 (App. 2021).

    Filed: January 8, 2026

    Would amend Rule 6.3 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure to provide that, before being permitted to withdrawn, trial or plea counsel must take certain steps to preserve a defendant’s right to appellate or post-conviction review.

    Comments must be submitted by no later than Friday, May 1, 2026, and any reply by a petitioner must be submitted no later than Monday, June 1, 2026.
    Attachments
    Yolanda Fox
    Basic Member
    Posts:297 Basic Member

    --
    02 Apr 2026 05:21 PM
    Michelle Villanueva Skura #032998
    Villanueva Skura Attorneys at Law
    1845 S. Dobson Road, Ste. 202
    Mesa, AZ 85202
    480-923-9001
    [email protected]
    Attachments
    Seth Apfel
    New Member
    Posts:1 New Member

    --
    23 Apr 2026 10:11 AM
    ARIZONA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE
    Seth M. Apfel, SB#032225
    Apfel Law Group, P.L.L.C.
    PO Box 8808
    Phoenix, AZ 85066
    (602) 499-8468
    [email protected]
    Attachments
    State Bar of Arizona
    Basic Member
    Posts:214 Basic Member

    --
    01 May 2026 08:55 PM
    Comment of the State Bar of Arizona

    Jessica J. Fotinos, Bar No. 019777
    General Counsel
    State Bar of Arizona
    4201 N. 24th Street, Suite 100
    Phoenix, AZ 85016-6288
    (602) 340-7236
    [email protected]
    Attachments
    Yolanda Fox
    Basic Member
    Posts:297 Basic Member

    --
    04 May 2026 03:07 PM
    Randy McDonald
    ASU Post-Conviction Clinic
    111 E. Taylor St.
    Phoenix, AZ 85004
    (480)965-2874
    [email protected]
    AZ Bar #032008
    Attachments
    Kevin Heade
    New Member
    Posts:19 New Member

    --
    21 May 2026 12:27 PM
    Kevin D. Heade
    AZ State Bar # 029909
    Training Director
    Pinal County Public Defender
    P.O. Box 2457
    Florence, AZ 85132
    (52) 866-7199
    [email protected]

    Pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the Arizona Supreme Court Rules, the Pinal County Public Defender and Pinal County Office of Public Defense Services jointly submit this Reply in support of the petition to amend Ariz. R. Crim. P. 6.3. The comments overwhelmingly confirm the Petition’s central premise: the current version of Rule 6.3 creates a procedural gap that leaves pleading defendants vulnerable to the loss of their only avenue of appellate review through the failure to perform a simple ministerial act. Even the opposing comment reinforces the need for reform by establishing how a drafting oversight in the current rule has contributed to constitutional and ethical misunderstandings. This Court should adopt the proposal for the reasons in the Petition, the supporting comments, and the attached Reply.




    Attachments
    Topic is locked