FAQ

Register       Login

Your Help Needed: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].

 

 

Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

Proposed Local Rules

                

 

Welcome!

 

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website. To post a petition or comment, however, you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

BEFORE POSTING, PLEASE READ: 

Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment.  Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 01 May 2025 10:04 PM by  Patricia Madsen
R-24-0061 ARFLP Rule 45
 3 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
David Tascoe
New Member
Posts:20 New Member

--
20 Dec 2024 01:58 PM
    David Tascoe, COFC Staff on behalf of:

    Judge Greg Sakall, Chair
    Committee on Family Court
    Associate Presiding Judge
    Pima County Superior Court
    110 West Congress Street
    Tucson, AZ 85701
    [email protected]

    Rule 45(b)(1) of the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure requires parties filing consent decrees to separately file a Spousal Maintenance Calculator Worksheet. If the stipulated amount or duration is outside of the applicable guidelines, the decree must include a statement that the stipulation will allow the receiving party to become self-sufficient.

    This Committee on Family Court has received input that parties filing consent decrees should not be required to file a Worksheet and that not all receiving parties will achieve self-sufficiency.

    The Committee on Family Court met on December 5, 2024. A motion to support the filing this rule petition passed unanimously.


    Would amend Rule 45(b)(1) of the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure to remove the requirement for parties filing consent decrees to file a Spousal Maintenance Calculator Worksheet and require them to acknowledge that any award of spousal maintenance is appropriate and just.

    Filed: December 20, 2024

    Would amend Rule 45(b)(1) of the Rules of Family Law Procedure to delete the requirement for parties filing a consent decree to file a Spousal Maintenance Calculator Worksheet and instead require them to acknowledge that an award of spousal maintenance is appropriate and just.

    Comments must be submitted by no later than Thursday, May 1, 2025, and any reply by a petitioner must be submitted no later than Monday, June 2, 2025.
    Attachments
    Helen Davis
    New Member
    Posts: New Member

    --
    14 Apr 2025 06:54 PM
    To Whom It May Concern:

    I am writing to communicate that the Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers is in favor of this amendment to Rule 45.

    All the best,
    Helen R. Davis
    President
    Arizona Chapter
    American Academy of
    Matrimonial Lawyers

    Senior Member
    The Cavanagh Law Firm, P.A.
    1850 N. Central Avenue
    Suite 1900
    Phoenix, AZ 85004
    602-322-4008
    [email protected]
    afoster
    New Member
    Posts:48 New Member

    --
    30 Apr 2025 04:04 PM
    Comment in support of R-24-0061 on behalf of:

    Samuel A. Thumma
    Chair, Arizona Commission on Access to Justice
    Judge, Arizona Court of Appeals
    Division One
    State Courts Building
    1501 West Washington Street
    Phoenix, AZ 85007-3329
    Telephone: (602) 452-6700
    Attachments
    Patricia Madsen
    New Member
    Posts:2 New Member

    --
    01 May 2025 10:04 PM
    To Whom It May Concern:

    I am the Managing Attorney of the Family Law Unit at Community Legal Services (CLS), a nonprofit civil legal aid program serving Maricopa, Yavapai, Mohave, Yuma, and La Paz Counties. I am also an appointed member of the Spousal Maintenance Guidelines Review Subcommittee.

    I am writing to express general support for Rule Change Petition No. R-24-0061 and to raise one concern. At CLS, we assist many pro per litigants to represent themselves in their dissolution of marriage cases. Many of those litigants, several of them victims and survivors of domestic violence, find themselves at a disadvantage in the process, lacking access to financial support and other resources, and often facing opposing parties who are represented by attorneys.

    While the goal of encouraging settlement via consent decrees is admirable and often beneficial, efficiency should never eclipse fairness. Both parties to an agreement should be fully informed, not just about what they are gaining in any settlement, but also about what they are potentially giving up.

    The leap from requiring parties to file a completed spousal maintenance worksheet to completely ignoring the guidelines is a big one.

    It’s hard to imagine how any party, let alone a self-represented party, would be capable of acknowledging that an award of spousal maintenance is “appropriate and just,” without ever consulting the guidelines that are intended to provide at least an estimation of those parameters.

    As such, I suggest adding a reference to the Spousal Maintenance Guidelines in Rule 45(b)(1), should the amendment proposed in Petition No. R-24-0061 be adopted. For example, the section could instead read: “It must state the terms of the parties’ agreement. For dissolution or legal separation decrees that include an award of spousal maintenance, the parties must acknowledge they have reviewed the Spousal Maintenance Guidelines, and any award of spousal maintenance is appropriate and just.”

    Again, I acknowledge the value of simplifying processes. However, if an agreement on spousal maintenance cannot withstand acknowledging the guidelines, that should be cause for concern.

    Sincerely,

    Patricia A. Madsen
    Managing Attorney, Family Law Unit
    Community Legal Services
    305 South 2nd Avenue
    Phoenix, AZ 85003
    (602) 258-3434
    [email protected]
    Topic is locked