FAQ

Register       Login

Your Help Needed: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].

 

 

Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

Proposed Local Rules

                

 

Welcome!

 

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website. To post a petition or comment, however, you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

BEFORE POSTING, PLEASE READ: 

Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment.  Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 13 Jul 2026 12:34 PM by  Amanda M
R-26-0042 PETITION TO AMEND RULES 38 AND 39 - EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION REQUESTED
 0 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Amanda M
New Member
Posts:2 New Member

--
13 Jul 2026 12:34 PM
    David K. Byers
    Administrative Director
    Administrative Office of the Courts
    1501 W. Washington, Suite 411
    Phoenix, AZ 85007-3327
    Phone: (602) 452-3301
    [email protected]

    Read in isolation, the Servicemember Civil Relief Act (SCRA) requires state licensing authorities to recognize a servicemember’s or spouse’s license to practice law in another U.S. jurisdiction as valid to practice law in in Arizona with minimal restrictions. While the Court has been and remains available to consider applications for licensure made directly under SCRA, adoption of the proposed Rule 38(e) Certification of Military Servicemember and Military Servicemember Spouse would signal the Court’s willingness to consider applications for licensure from a servicemember or servicemember’s spouse while properly retaining its exclusive authority. “The determination of who shall practice law in Arizona and under what condition is a function placed by the state constitution in this court.” Scheehle v. Justs. of the Supreme Ct. of the State of Arizona, 211 Ariz 282, 290 ¶ 29 (2005).

    Expedited consideration on the August 2026 Rules Agenda and emergency adoption at that time is requested.

    Filed: July 13, 2026

    Would adopt a new Rule 38(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona governing the certification of a military servicemember or servicemember’s spouse to practice law in Arizona and would abrogate Rule 39(d) of the same rules.

    Comments due no later than October 1, 2026, and any reply due no later than October 15, 2026.
    Attachments
    You are not authorized to post a reply.