FAQ

Register       Login

Your Help Needed: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].

 

 

Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

Proposed Local Rules

                 

 

Welcome!

 

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website. To post a petition or comment, however, you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

BEFORE POSTING, PLEASE READ: 

Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment.  Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why. 
     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 16 Oct 2024 02:49 PM by  Yolanda Fox
R-24-0046 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 53, RULES OF THE AZ SUPREME COURT
 23 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Page 2 of 2 << < 12
Author Messages
Amanda McQueen
New Member
Posts:24 New Member

--
11 Oct 2024 06:35 PM
David K. Byers
Administrative Director
Administrative Office of the Courts
1501 W. Washington, Suite 411
Phoenix, AZ 85007
(602) 452-3301
[email protected]

Petitioner hereby files his Reply in support of permanent adoption of the amendment.
Attachments
David Redkey
New Member
Posts:3 New Member

--
11 Oct 2024 07:38 PM
"The commenters’ assessment that a lawyer no longer has an ethical duty to
inform the state bar of violations in accordance with Ethical Rule 8.3 is not
supported. Petitioner did not seek any change to that ethical rule or any part of the
Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct."

Yet, Daniel Mazza, Lawrence F. Scaringelli, Rick Kilfoy, Mark J. Theut, Alexia Semlek refused to report the misconduct of William A. Clarke.

Hon. Lisa Ann VandenBerg flatly refused to report the misconduct of William A. Clarke.

All of the above parties refused to report the conflict of interest between attorneys of the Theut, Theut & Theut and Theut, Scaringelli & Kupiszewski.

Seems like removing accountability is why some lawyers support it...

I wonder why.
Yolanda Fox
Basic Member
Posts:294 Basic Member

--
16 Oct 2024 11:01 AM
George M. Papa
1116 East Kramer Circle
Mesa, Arizona 85203
Telephone: (480) 844-7356
Email: [email protected]
Attachments
Yolanda Fox
Basic Member
Posts:294 Basic Member

--
16 Oct 2024 02:49 PM
George M. Papa
1116 East Kramer Circle
Mesa, Arizona 85203
Telephone: (480) 844-7356
Email: [email protected]
Attachments
Topic is locked
Page 2 of 2 << < 12
Forums Rule Change Petitions under Consideration Rules of the Supreme Court