Rules Forum - Court Rules Forum - Rule Change Petitions under

Your Help Needed: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].

Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present)

Proposed Local Rules

Welcome!

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website. To post a petition or comment, however, you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page.

BEFORE POSTING, PLEASE READ:

Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment. Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why.

Forums
Search Forum
Advanced SearchTopicsPosts

Forums Rule Change Petitions under Consideration

Rules of the Supreme Court

Search this forum:

You are not authorized to create a new topic

Page 12 of 14

Topics

�Replies

�Views

�Last Post

5 Replies and 14293 Views R-09-0038 Petition to Amend Rule 38(d), Rules of the Supreme Court Of Arizona Started by �Anonymous R-09-0038 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 38(d), RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT WOULD REORGANIZE AND CLARIFY PROVISIONS RELATING TO LIMITED PRACTICE OF LAW BY CLINICAL LAW PROFESSORS AND QUALIFIED LAW STUDENTS Petitioner: The Phoenix School of Law Interim Dean Eugene Clark Directo...

14293

by �myarnell

01 Nov 2010 04:50 PM

5 Replies and 14685 Views R-10-0018 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 91(e), RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT Started by �Anonymous R-10-0018 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 91(e), RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT, OR OTHERWISE ADOPT A NEW SUPREME COURT RULE FOR THE AOC WOULD REQUIRE SUPERIOR COURT CLERKS TO REPORT TO THE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT JUDGES' VIOLATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL 60-DAY REQUIREMENT FOR DECIDING MATTERS IN SUPERIOR COURT Petitioner: Mike Palmer PO Box 5564 Glendale, AZ 85312 ...

14685

by �MPalmer

30 Jun 2010 06:58 PM

0 Replies and 15588 Views R-10-0029 Rule 94(b), Rules of the Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous Petition to Amend Rule 94(b), Rules of the Supreme Court Would conform the rule to statutory changes, effective July 29, 2010, authorizing the presiding judge of the county to close the court on the day after Thanksgiving and keep the court open on Columbus Day, if the county board of supervisors has adopted a resolution designating the day after Thanksgiving as a legal holiday in place of Columbus Day. Petitioner: David...

15588

22 Jun 2010 10:27 AM

14 Replies and 15359 Views R-09-0044 Petition to Amend Rules 46-74, Rules of the Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous R-09-0044 PETITION TO AMEND RULES 46-74, RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT WOULD AMEND THE RULES GOVERNING ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY ADMINISTRATION TO INCLUDE THE BEST PRACTICES OF THE COLORADO ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM Petitioner: David K. Byers, Chairman Attorney Discipline Task Force ...

15359

by �MHarrison

18 Jun 2010 02:23 PM

2 Replies and 14920 Views R-10-0023 Petition to Amend Rule 42, Rules of the Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous R-10-0023 Petition to Amend Rule 42, Rules of the Supreme Court Would amend the Rules of Professional Conduct to permit a lawyer referral service to charge a percentage of legal fees earned by participating lawyers. Petitioner: Maricopa County Bar Association by Mark A. Harrison and James K. Rogers Osborn Maledon PA 2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2794 ...

14920

by �lkoschney

10 Jun 2010 01:28 PM

4 Replies and 14793 Views R-10-0016 Petition to Repeal or Amend Rule 45 of the Rules of Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous R-10-0016 PETITION TO REPEAL OR AMEND RULE 45, RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT WOULD REPEAL MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION OR, ALTERNATIVELY, EXEMPT LAWYERS FROM COMPLYING WITH MCLE REQUIREMENTS FOR TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF ADMISSION TO THE BAR OR UNTIL LAW SCHOOL DEBT IS PAID, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER Petitioner: Eliot M. Held 322 Karen Ave. 1003 Las Vegas, NV 89109 (520)404-6974 emheldmac....

14793

by �tsdraegeth

13 May 2010 03:04 PM

1 Replies and 14145 Views R-10-0008 Sua Sponte Petition to Amend Rule 111(g), Rules of the Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous R-10-0008 SUA SPONTE PETITION TO AMEND RULE 111(g), RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT WOULD GIVE THE SUPREME COURT THE OPTION OF DEPUBLISHING EITHER A PORTION OF A COURT OF APPEALS' OPINION OR THE ENTIRE OPINION Petitioner: Staff Attorneys’ Office Arizona Supreme Court 1501 W. Washington, Suite 445 Phoenix, AZ 85007 (602) 452-3528 Ellen Crowley: ecrowleycourts.az.gov ...

14145

by �AZStateBar

11 May 2010 03:40 PM

0 Replies and 15823 Views R-10-0011 Petition to Adopt New Rule of the Supreme Court, Procedures for Nominations for the Independent Redistricting Commission Started by �Anonymous R-10-0011 PETITION TO ADOPT NEW RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT, PROCEDURES FOR NOMINATIONS FOR THE INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION WOULD ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR NOMINATING MEMBERS OF THE INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION, INCLUDING A FULL OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE PROCESS Annette M. Corallo Program Manager Commission on Appellate Court Appointments 1501 W. Washington, Suite 2...

15823

07 Jan 2010 01:56 PM

0 Replies and 15627 Views R-10-0009 Sua Sponte Petition to Amend Rule 1 and Post Conviction Form No. 1, Rules of the Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous R-10-0009 SUA SPONTE PETITION TO AMEND RULE 1 AND POST CONVICTION FORM NO. 1, RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT WOULD CLARIFY THAT THERE IS NO FEE FOR FILING A WRIT FOR HABEAS CORPUS Petitioner: Staff Attorneys’ Office Arizona Supreme Court 1501 W. Washington, Suite 445 Phoenix, AZ 85007 (602) 452-3528 Ellen Crowley: ecrowleycourts.az.gov Fil...

15627

06 Jan 2010 06:24 PM

0 Replies and 15356 Views R-09-0039 Petition to Amend Supreme Court Rules 42 and 43 Started by �Anonymous R-09-0039 PETITION TO AMEND SUPREME COURT RULES 42 AND 43 WOULD CLARIFY PROVISIONS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS RELATING TO ACCEPTANCE OF CREDIT CARD PAYMENT OF ADVANCE FEES AND COSTS Petitioner: John Furlong, Bar No. 018356 General Counsel State Bar of Arizona 4201 North 24th Street, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85016-6288 (602) 252-4804 ...

15356

18 Dec 2009 05:27 PM

29 Replies and 29519 Views R-08-0016 Petition to Amend Rule 35(b) Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous

(

1 2 )

R-08-0016 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 35(b), RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AMEND RULE 35(b) TO INCLUDE INDIAN LAW AS ONE OF THE SUBJECT AREAS WHICH MAY BE TESTED ON THE ARIZONA BAR EXAMINATION. Petitioner: Robert B. Van Wyck Chief Bar Counsel State Bar of Arizona 4201 N. 24th Street, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85016-...

29519

by �annedep

30 Jun 2009 03:53 PM

17 Replies and 16777 Views R-08-0039 Rule 123, Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, Rule 2.3 Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 5 Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure Started by �Anonymous R-08-0039 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 123, RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT TO PROVIDE GREATER ACCESS TO CASE RECORDS WHILE BEING MINDFUL OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION THAT MIGHT BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORDS Petitioner: Michael K. Jeanes, Chair Supreme Court Rule 123 & Data Disseminat...

16777

by �mhardman

25 Jun 2009 02:00 PM

2 Replies and 15117 Views R-09-0012 RULE 92(a)(1) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA Started by �Anonymous R-09-0012 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 92(a)(1), RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT WOULD REQUIRE THE PRESIDING JUDGE IN EACH COUNTY TO CREATE A RANDOM CASE ASSIGNMENT SYSTEM WITHIN EACH JUDICIAL DIVISION FOR ALL CASES IN WHICH A JUDGE HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN INVOLVED. Petitioner: ANDREW P. THOMAS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY (FIRM STATE BAR NO. 0003200) PHILIP J. MACDO...

15117

by �lkoschney

28 May 2009 05:27 PM

5 Replies and 16773 Views R-08-0013 Rule 38(d), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous R-08-0013 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 38(d), RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT TO INCLUDE GRADUATED LAW STUDENTS THAT HAVE ALREADY TAKEN THE BAR EXAMINATION BUT ARE STILL WAITING FOR BAR RESULTS TO PRACTICE LAW UNDER THE SAME EXCEPTION THAT IS AFFORDED TO LAW STUDENTS WHO PRACTICE IN A CLINICAL SETTING OR UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED ATTORNEY WHO IS ALSO A MEMBER OF THE STATE BAR. Petitioner: J...

16773

by �Jeremy.claridge

28 May 2009 01:32 PM

37 Replies and 29561 Views R-08-0012 Rule 31(d)(11), Rules of the Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous

(

1 2 )

R-08-0012 Rule 31(d)(11), Rules of the Supreme Court TO ALLOW MOBILE HOME AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK TENANTS TO BE REPRESENTED BY A NON-ATTORNEY UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES IN HEARINGS BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS. Arizona Association of Manufactured Home and R.V. Owners, Pro Per 2334 S. McClintock Dr. Tempe, AZ 85282 480-966-9566 ...

29561

by �lkoschney

27 May 2009 12:23 PM

1 Replies and 14115 Views R-09-0011 Petition to Amend Rule 50 and Include 50.1, Rules of the Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous R-09-0011 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 50 AND ADD RULE 50.1, RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT WOULD CODIFY THE PRACTICE OF APPOINTING PAID HEARING OFFICERS AND WOULD ESTABLISH THE PAID HEARING OFFICER POSITION AS THE SOLE MEANS OF ADJUDICATING FORMAL DISCIPLINARY CASES Petitioner: John Furlong General Counsel Bar No. 018356 State Bar of Arizona ...

14115

by �MHarrison

20 May 2009 07:10 PM

4 Replies and 14201 Views R-09-0003 PETITION TO AMEND RULES 47, 48, 50, 56, 57, 65 and 72, ARIZONA RULES OF SUPREME COURT Started by �Anonymous R-09-0003 PETITION TO AMEND RULES 47, 48, 50, 56, 57, 65 AND 72, RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT WOULD IMPLEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF COMPLAINT RESOLUTION IN THE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE PROCESS BASED ON EXPERIENCE OF PILOT PROGRAM USING PAID HEARING OFFICER. Petitioner: David K. Byers, Director Administrative Office of the Courts, Arizona Supreme Court ...

14201

by �MHarrison

20 May 2009 07:08 PM

1 Replies and 14282 Views R-08-0011 Rule 31(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court Started by �Anonymous R-08-0011 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 31(d) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA TO ALLOW AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS NOT AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THE STATE BAR TO REPRESENT EITHER A PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION, AN INTERIM OPERATOR APPOINTED BY THE COMMISSION, OR A NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION IN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION. Christopher C. Kempley Arizona Corporation Commissio...

14282

by �AZStateBar

19 May 2009 04:17 PM

1 Replies and 14527 Views R-08-0014 Petition to Amend Supreme Court Rule 42 Started by �Anonymous R-08-0014 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 42, RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT TO ALLOW A LAWYER TO DISCLOSE INFORMATION RELATING TO THE REPRESENTATION OF A CLIENT TO PREVENT REASONABLY CERTAIN DEATH OR SUBSTANTIAL BODILY HARM. Petitioner: Robert B. Van Wyck Chief Bar Counsel State Bar of Arizona 4201 N. 24th Street, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85...

14527

by �jmillet

09 May 2009 03:10 PM

1 Replies and 14442 Views R-08-0038 Supreme Court Rule 96. Powers and Duties of Court Commissioners Started by �Anonymous R-08-0038 PETITION TO AMEND SUPREME COURT RULE 96 WOULD EXPAND THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF COURT COMMISSIONERS TO ENABLE THEM TO HEAR A WIDER RANGE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS Petitioner: David K. Byers, Administrative Director Administrative Office of the Court 1501 W. Washington, Ste. 411 Phoenix, AZ 85007 (602) 452-3301 Filed December 2...

14442

by �BrianStanley

10 Apr 2009 07:55 PM

You are not authorized to create a new topic

Forums Rule Change Petitions under Consideration Rules of the Supreme Court

Page 12 of 14